Many litigants and attorneys have rated the following judges as NOT THE COURTS FOR FATHERS.

Department M: WILLIAM POTTER

and

Department T: GAYLE NATHAN

WILLIAM POTTER

Judge Potter was elected only because of the candidate running against him was already defeated by voters in the past. He was the Devils bargain, the lesser of two evils.

Judge Potter needs to enroll in an Anger Management Class, or Behavior Control Class or just see a doctor for medication.

Judge Potter seems to think that a mother arrested 6 times for prescription fraud with over 800 pills of oxycondin a month is fit for custody, as a “functioning addict”. In realty she is the provider of hundreds of pills in the legal community. Is this why she gets favoritism and free attorney services? What do you think?

Potter has developed or has always had a pro-mother prejudice, and guess how many chances to men? Unbiased Judge, Neutral Judge? NO. He will be drawing opponents next election, guaranteed!

GAYLE NATHAN

Department T, Gayle Nathan is no surprise to E.R.D.F.

During her private practice she was known for her hatred of men and fathers. She was known to be ethically challenged. She has shown her same rude, nasty behavior and her blatant hatred of men and fathers. She was known to be ethically challenged. Fair, neutral, unbiased Judge? NO. Men as Fathers will never get a fair ruling in this department.

Her first day on the job, 22 litigants opted out of her court (peremptory challenge). Now everyone in Clark County knows of this hater. Unfair bias Judge with an agenda, BEWARE!